This site is the blogging component for my main site Crank Astronomy (formerly "Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy"). It will provide a more interactive component for discussion of the main site content. I will also use this blog to comment on work in progress for the main site, news events, and other pseudoscience-related issues.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Quantized Redshifts. VIII. An Uncommon Power Spectral Density "Blooper"
The content of this post has been deleted by the author.
Since you have locked out Mr. Delano from responding to your last two posts (posts of Saturday, March 5 and Saturday, February 26) he has asked me to respond to you. Hopefully you will not resort to blocking me also, but just in case, my response will be posted to the Galileo Was Wrong website
My comment stream has been relatively quiet since I started the QR series and it has sometimes been a week between checking. I've had a few appear from March 16 & 21, but the comments prior to that was February 26, and I've let all of them through.
There are a number of commenters which blogger seems to classify as spam and does not include in the unmoderated comments count. I don't see them unless I actually visit the comments tab. If blogger dumps them after a time, that might explain any disappearing comments.
As for why I don't publish this treatment, or contact the journal editorial board? What makes you think such a process happens overnight? I have been contacting others in this field and awaiting feedback. That process alone might take a few months.
As for some of the other comments in "Answer to Bridgman", I say, be careful what you wish for. You might just get it! ;^)
2 comments:
Dr. Bridgeman,
Since you have locked out Mr. Delano from responding to your last two posts (posts of Saturday, March 5 and Saturday, February 26) he has asked me to respond to you. Hopefully you will not resort to blocking me also, but just in case, my response will be posted to the Galileo Was Wrong website
Robert Sungenis, Ph.D.
http://www.galileowaswrong.com/galileowaswrong/features/AnwswerToBridgman.pdf
I have not blocked Mr. Delano.
My comment stream has been relatively quiet since I started the QR series and it has sometimes been a week between checking. I've had a few appear from March 16 & 21, but the comments prior to that was February 26, and I've let all of them through.
There are a number of commenters which blogger seems to classify as spam and does not include in the unmoderated comments count. I don't see them unless I actually visit the comments tab. If blogger dumps them after a time, that might explain any disappearing comments.
As for why I don't publish this treatment, or contact the journal editorial board? What makes you think such a process happens overnight? I have been contacting others in this field and awaiting feedback. That process alone might take a few months.
As for some of the other comments in "Answer to Bridgman", I say, be careful what you wish for. You might just get it! ;^)
And I'm still awaiting Mr. DeLano's demonstration of the five Lagrange point locations via geocentrism.
Post a Comment