tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361412992308994774.post870188452217205532..comments2023-11-19T19:19:12.773-05:00Comments on Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy: Another Big Bang Prediction Confirmed. More Headaches for the Infinite Age CosmologiesW.T."Tom" Bridgmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10889134728080314165noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361412992308994774.post-79670607320495598262012-12-31T08:29:15.239-05:002012-12-31T08:29:15.239-05:00To gregster,
So you do deny the 2nd Law of Thermo...To gregster,<br /><br />So you do deny the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics or advocate some form of Perpetual Motion?W.T."Tom" Bridgmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10889134728080314165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2361412992308994774.post-33096058022645386782012-12-31T01:30:04.908-05:002012-12-31T01:30:04.908-05:00Now Bridgman gives himself problems there. Matter ...Now Bridgman gives himself problems there. Matter has always been around. He says "In a universe of infinite age, everything has had enough time to reach its equilibrium configuration" He's wrong already because the universe continues to exist and shows no signs of approximating infinity. He's stated a contradiction. Contradictions cannot exist. We may glean his meaning, but even so, it's incoherent. So the rest is a non-sequitur. When he goes on; there being "no free energy left" I know he's talking crap. He's a poor adversary. From this alone I think he will be a phony.gregsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04786701115887458801noreply@blogger.com