I like posting the slashdot link to many of these despite the rather low signal-to-noise ratio of the comment. The slashdot audience is sufficiently technically and scientifically savvy that the comments often include interesting and relevant side-links not included in the main story.
Slashdot: Evangelical Scientists Debate Creation Story
Evangelicals Question The Existence Of Adam And Eve
by Barbara Bradley Hagerty
Some interesting quotes from the article:
Venema is part of a growing cadre of Christian scholars who say they want their faith to come into the 21st century.This must happen, or Christians risk scientific and technological illiteracy vital to maintaining a growing a modern society. Many of the creationists who comment in this blog have no idea of how many of the technologies they use depend on science which they wish to deny.
“From my viewpoint, a historical Adam and Eve is absolutely central to the truth claims of the Christian faith,“ says Fazale Rana, vice president of Reasons To BelieveI'm a bit disappointed in this as I do follow some of RTBs content. Their astronomy is pretty good but I often disagree with some of their theological content. I find it interesting that as more extrasolar planets are discovered, their position seems to be slowly migrating away from a doctrine that humans must be the only intelligent life in the cosmos.
BioLogos and the June 2011 “Christianity Today” Cover Story
Slashdot: Teacher Cannot be Sued for Denying Creationism
NCSE: A final victory in Texas
Creationists loose big in a case over science textbooks.